Individual consultations helped get stronger buy-in and commitment from the higher authorities and employees. //--> Make sure you're ready for the next level. The reasons for a paper being rejected once it has been reviewed fall mainly into two categories: (1) problems with the research; and (2) problems with the writing/presentation of the paper. NPGManuscript under editorial consideration Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Yet as we demand more transparency from our authors, we appreciate that we must also provide more insight into our own editorial processes, and so here we outline how the Nature Methods editorial team evaluates submitted papers. The corresponding (or other single designated) author is responsible on behalf of all co-authors for the accuracy of all content, including spelling of names and current affiliations of all co-authors, so please ensure these are checked carefully. How long does it take for a manuscript to be reviewed? The editor is checking for any problems with formatting and all criteria have been met. Health and Human Rights Journal welcomes articles that explore the centrality of the right to health in all social, economic, cultural, and environmental contexts. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. SOURCE: "Poetry and Fame," in Bid the Vassal Soar: Interpretive Essays on the Life and Poetry of Phillis Wheatley (ca. A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based. While writing a peer review may take between 4 and 8 h, in only 19% of all reported cases authors were informed about the outcome in less than a month. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. the review process improved the manuscript significantly and was very straightforward. See here and here for more information about our policies on transparent reporting. For more information, please see our ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Science is a weekly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes significant original scientific research, plus reviews as well as commentary on current research, science policy, and issues of interest to the broad scientific community. It should be limited to the most essential and important aspects of the entry. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. The dataset is uploaded is OSF. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Make sure Nature Methods is the most suitable journal for your work Aims and scope, Check that Nature Methods accepts the content type you are working on Content types, Read and understand our policies Editorial policies, Understand our publishing models and costs Publishing options, Does Nature Methods accept Presubmission enquiries? //-->